| 4.16 |
Universal religious negative instruments of power
|
|
| |
One of the greatest assets and
distinctions of the human species from other resident species on the planet
Earth is our ability to remember and to associate concepts- memory and
intelligence of classification. This gives us our ability to remember stories,
to remember written symbols to word concepts to oral sounds. |
|
| |
We remember significant events even
though we may desensitize ourselves on a day to day living to these critical
moments such as death. But just as we remember, farewell and celebrate the
death of people we love with funerals, burials and prayers, our ancestors also
understood the significance of such moments. |
|
| |
Most fundamental to all species with
memory is the abhorrence of the sight of death of their own. Something deep
within the collective mind of the species cry's out at the lessening of the
chance for the species to continue to sustain itself. We see it more as the
loss of a blood line, a family, a dynasty, a tribe's ability to have any more
children, to live. Therefore we dread the death of others. |
|
| |
Our own dread of death or illness |
|
| |
More so, it is our own personal
apprehension of the feelings of pain and ultimately of death that lurks deep
within all of us. Whether our mind can overpower our fear of death, or pain (as
it sometimes can), most of us at some point in our lives fear or have feared
pain and death. |
|
| |
The extension of the concept of life and
the concept of death |
|
| |
Religions too understood the power of
such moments as the giving of birth and the ending of physical life (death).
They took control of the concepts and their potential beyond the physical cycle
of life and death of nature into a realm entirely different to that of the
consciousness of other lower developed species. The human being is able to
conceptualize the extension of life beyond the physical (heaven) as well as
death beyond the physical (hell, hades). |
|
| |
This is where religion has played and
continues to play a significant influence on our sense of self, destiny and
final destination- in the concepts that alter our beliefs on where we might be
heading after death, to eternal life, new life or eternal death/pain, or
nothingness. |
|
| |
The development of negative instruments of
power threatening physical death, pain and eternal death, pain. |
|
| |
Religions not only developed concepts
that extended our thinking to the possibility of life after death or eternal
pain after death, they developed instruments of power along with them. |
|
| |
Through the rituals of magic and the
power of objects and concepts, religions have influenced to the illness and
death of many millions of people. |
|
| |
The most crude of these instruments of
power have been: |
|
| |
|
direct physical injury/death |
|
indirect physical injury through magic |
|
direct physical fear of danger and thus control |
|
|
| |
The negative instrument of power- direct
physical injury/death
|
|
| |
The actual injury, illness or disablement
of human beings via the power of Gods, or of the representatives of the Gods
has been a feature of religion and society since the very beginning. |
|
| |
In tribal and aboriginal cultures, we see
the central role of the Witch Doctor, playing the dualistic role of not only
capable of healing, but injuring human beings through their control of the
"spirits", or "gods". |
|
| |
In larger, organized religions we see the
same thing- religions with their own military forces capable of seizing cities,
countries and individuals in the name of religion and having them tortured,
imprisoned or executed. |
|
| |
War and religion are two sides of the
same coin when considering the launching of calculated aggression against
nearby settlements of human beings. Just in the past one thousand years, in
excess of 50 million human beings have lost their lives on religious grounds.
|
|
| |
The negative instrument of power- indirect
physical injury through magic
|
|
| |
Religion through its absolute concepts
and ethereal concepts also possesses powerful negative instruments of power in
the belief that physical injury can occur indirectly. |
|
| |
A sword may not need to be used, a curse
may cause you to fall ill. This "black" magic has been a powerful tool of
religious practice for thousands of years and continues strongly in many
countries, especially in Haiti with the perpetuation of the powers of Voodoo. |
|
| |
The negative instrument of power-direct
physical fear of danger and thus control |
|
| |
Overwhelmingly, religion has the
strongest instruments of power via the tools of fear and danger. |
|
| |
Fear |
|
| |
The word fear in its original forms are
found throughout the ancient European languages, from Old English (faeran,
faer=danger, ambush, peril), Old Saxon (faron= lie in wait), Old High German
(faren, fara= plot against, lie in wait, ambush, danger, deceit) and Old Norse
(faera= taunt, slight).
|
|
| |
In the original sense, considering the
earliest definition of"sudden ambush", the meaning of fear was "a state of
alarm or dread." Thus the concept of "fearing" those things that may ambush our
intentions precedes all other definitions of fear. |
|
| |
Around the late 14th C, the additional
and more contemporary meaning appeared of "the emotion of pain or uneasiness
caused by the sense of impending danger, or by the apprehension of evil (often
personified)." (In Old German the word gefahr = danger.) |
|
| |
This additional meaning to the definition
of fear is historically important, for it appears before the more modern
definition of danger , therefore implies a link between (a) what people in
authority can do to subjects (ancient definition of danger) and (b) what
subjects feel about the threat of that power being used (fear).
|
|
| |
Hence this second definition represents
the birth of the concept of fear, expressed as the emotions of dread, anxiety,
pain, uneasiness as a "weapon of the mind" of those in authority against those
they wish to control. |
|
| |
Then around the late 15th C, the circular
meaning was applied "the state of fearing something, especially a mingled
feeling of dread and reverence towards God, or formerly any rightful
authority."
|
|
| |
It is one of the more bizarre definitions
in the English language, considering the common usage of the word fear and the
contemporary concepts of God being loving and kind. Here we see a reinforcement
of the weapon qualities of fear, now expressed using the concept of God as a
kind of "absolute fear". |
|
| |
Now those in authority could not only
wield the weapons of the State against subjects in a state of fear, but could
call upon the religious aspect of Gods wrath a religious and absolute fear.
|
|
| |
The word fear in its original forms are
found throughout the ancient European languages, from Old English (faeran,
faer=danger, ambush, peril), Old Saxon (faron= lie in wait), Old High German
(faren, fara= plot against, lie in wait, ambush, danger, deceit) and Old Norse
(faera= taunt, slight).
|
|
| |
In the original sense, considering the
earliest definition of"sudden ambush", the meaning of fear was "a state of
alarm or dread." Thus the concept of "fearing" those things that may ambush our
intentions precedes all other definitions of fear. |
|
| |
Around the late 14th C, the additional
and more contemporary meaning appeared of "the emotion of pain or uneasiness
caused by the sense of impending danger, or by the apprehension of evil (often
personified)." (In Old German the word gefahr = danger.) |
|
| |
This additional meaning to the definition
of fear is historically important, for it appears before the more modern
definition of danger , therefore implies a link between (a) what people in
authority can do to subjects (ancient definition of danger) and (b) what
subjects feel about the threat of that power being used (fear).
|
|
| |
Hence this second definition represents
the birth of the concept of fear, expressed as the emotions of dread, anxiety,
pain, uneasiness as a "weapon of the mind" of those in authority against those
they wish to control. |
|
| |
Then around the late 15th C, the circular
meaning was applied "the state of fearing something, especially a mingled
feeling of dread and reverence towards God, or formerly any rightful
authority."
|
|
| |
It is one of the more bizarre definitions
in the English language, considering the common usage of the word fear and the
contemporary concepts of God being loving and kind. Here we see a reinforcement
of the weapon qualities of fear, now expressed using the concept of God as a
kind of "absolute fear". |
|
| |
Now those in authority could not only
wield the weapons of the State against subjects in a state of fear, but could
call upon the religious aspect of Gods wrath a religious and absolute fear.
|
|
| |
Danger |
|
| |
The word danger comes from the Old French
word dangier, itself a derivation of the Latin roots domnus, dominus (lord,
master). In its original sense, the word meant "The power of a lord,
jurisdiction, dominion." However, later the word cam to mean "(Power of a
Lord); power to dispose of, or to do harm." |
|
| |
It wasn't until the late 15th Century
that the word came to have its general modern meaning "liability, or exposure
to harm or injury; risk, peril." |
|
| |
Danger therefore is a strange word, given
its historical attachment to the potential negative behaviour of those in
Authority. It is also interesting that this underlying unconscious association
with the negative aspects of authority ( e.g. warnings on power lines, mine
fields, security installations) continues today. |
|
| |
The negative instrument of power-physical
and spiritual pain from breach of trust- sin (guilt) |
|
| |
The word sin, comes from the word sons
and sont meaning "guilt, guilty". Guilt in turn means literally "breach of
trust." Therefore sin by definition can be considered a "breach of trust by a
person in the divine rules". |
|
| |
Guilt also denotes a feeling of regret
and lessening of self perception, two negative qualities that are also
intimately linked to the concept of sin. All religions define the relative
sins.
|
|
| |
By definition, as administrations of
religions largely control the books of rituals, behaviors and meditations that
are considered pleasing and not pleasing, over the years the list of what is
good and what is sinful has changed from religion to religion, from age to age. |
|
| |
Sin has also been a powerful negative
instrument of power as religious administrations have been able to maintain
control by determining what they considered is sinful and what is not.
Currently, the Roman Catholic Church has used this religious negative
instrument of power to effect new sins such as computer fraud, smoking, as well
as older extraordinary sins such as contraception and priests having sexual
relations. |
|
| |
The negative instrument of power- Evil |
|
| |
Apart from the influence of magic,
religions have all had in some way or another the manifestations of powerful
negative instruments of power in the belief of evil spirits. |
|
| |
Evil spirits are defined universally as
entities that can move between dimensions or reality and unreality and physical
form and influence the physical health, mind, state of an individual
negatively. |
| |
All religions in some way have identified
evil beings existing and all have in some way identified negative behaviour as
being under the influence entrapment of these malevolent beings. |
| |
The fear of evil has in many periods of
history caused large followings and support for witch burnings and the hunting
of individuals who appear to have above-average skills. Many mid-wives of the
14th and 16th centuries suffered greatly at the hands of hoards of individuals
egged on by religious leaders to torture and murder these people. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Copyright © 2010 UCADIA. All rights reserved.
|