 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
||||||
|
|||||||
you are here: > UCA >
2. Models and meaning
 |
Basis for measuring the effectiveness of the model of UCA and
UCADIA
|
|
| During the discourse on the model- the Unique Collective Awareness describes a large number of components and summaries of other models of thought. The reason for this is that many of the UCA aligned ideas detailed within are introduced after a discussion of differences with other models. | ||
| In discussing other models, we have necessarily adopted a line of thinking and argument based on the principle ideas concerning the existence, nature, relationships and consequences of UCA-The Unique Collective Awareness. | ||
| In doing so, language is applied outlining perceived weaknesses and faults in other models | ||
| References to other models and perceived weaknesses and faults is done without any negative inference on the original authors of those models, or the people who subscribe and/or support them. | ||
| Individuals are perfectly entitled to subscribe to models that they find useful in their day to day lives. No one has the right to tell them whether they are right or wrong, which is fundamentally flawed logic in any case. | ||
| References to other models in most cases refer to perceived weaknesses in terms of utility and the ability of certain models to provide consistent and useful target outcomes. | ||
| 2.9.1 | Measuring the UCA like all models | |
| In any object assessment of the effectiveness of the model- The Unique Collective Awareness, the reader and/or critic must apply the same means as we described earlier in terms of the usefulness and utility of the model. | ||
| Any other means of assessing the model, via comparison to other models or subjective judgment are actions without basis and unable to withstand scrutiny themselves. | ||
|
Copyright © 2010 UCADIA. All rights reserved. |
||