 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
||||||
|
|||||||
you are here: > UCA >
2. Models and meaning
| 2.21 |
What is right? what is wrong?
|
|
| It is inevitable with any text that lays claim to such a wide utility that individuals and groups of individuals will seek to attack the model. | ||
| There reasons may include: o Having created alternative models that do not subscribe to the same concepts; o Being employed to protect or use alternative models that do no subscribe to the same concepts o A supporter of an alternative model (or models) that do not subscribe to the same concepts. o being employed to criticize new concepts and attempt to find greatness ( e.g. some specialist journalists). | ||
| We welcome all active investigation of the model and active debate. however, we point out the following criteria is essential before anyone can legitimately lay claim to negatively commenting on part or all of this model: | ||
| (1) | That this text has been read before criticizing part or all of it; | |
| (2) | That the basis of criticism is focused on the utility value and target outcomes- the usefulness of the model to the critic. | |
| (3) | (3) A critic has no right to say what is useful and not useful to another human being. Anyone who subscribes to this train of thought is guilty of imposing their will on others and breaching the fundamental freedoms of fellow human beings. | |
| (4) | Differences of the model in itself cannot be argued as a flaw. Again, the only objective form of criticism is relevant to the individual and in terms of the utility value and usefulness of the model. | |
| UCA is a model- an idea. There is no claim that what you will be reading is fact, no claim that it is 100% right and other theories are 100% wrong. Ultimately it is your choice as to whether you find what you read is useful or not. | ||
|
Copyright © 2010 UCADIA. All rights reserved. |
||