| 3.1 |
The quest for understanding
|
|
| |
The question of the purpose and meaning
of creation is as old as recorded human thought. Why was the universe created?
Who or what created the universe? For what purpose? What is the universe
ultimately made of? |
|
| |
The human need to find answers or an
answer to these questions, has pushed our quest in hundreds of directions, from
the investigation of what makes up atoms to towards the heavens of stars and
galaxies. |
|
| |
From the earliest times of organized
permanent settlements of humans, many tens of thousands of years ago,
historians have found ancient remains of human created star observatories in
Europe, the Americas, Africa and Asia, . We still have remnants of recorded
thought from ancient cultures in the Tigris/Euphrates region, Sth America and
Egypt and what they conceptualized were the answers to these questions on the
creation of the Universe. |
|
| |
Then we have the mountain of accumulated
human reflection on these questions from the time of famous thinkers such as
Buddha, Mohammed, Galileo, the Christian scholars, Descartes, Einstein and tens
of thousands of others, filling hundreds of thousands of pages on bookshelves
around the world. |
|
| |
Humanity now has multi-billion dollar
machines that can smash small pieces of matter to try to understand what we and
the Universe are made of, while at the same time we have billion dollar Earth
based and now space based telescopes, looking far out into space towards the
known boundaries of the Universe. |
|
| |
Never before has humanity had access to
such fantastic machinery to smash matter and look far out into space, to
formulate with super computers, possible models of behaviour of the Universe. |
|
| |
Yet, for all our inventions, for all our
thinking, we do not yet have anything more than conceptual models as to why was
the universe created? Who or what created the universe? For what purpose? What
is the universe ultimately made of? |
|
| |
Some scientists and students of science
may disagree; they may argue that the accumulated mountains of experiment data
and carefully crafted mathematical equations running on machines capable of
processing millions of bits of data a second represent "proof" of their models
being true. The same people may argue that such models as the Standard Model of
matter and hundreds of scientific laws represent a comprehensive model in
itself. |
|
| |
However, we are still to see seamless
unified theory of matter that explains every particle and every structure in
the universe, from the smallest possible to the largest. We are still to see a
unified model of every force in the universe that is consistent from the
smallest levels of matter through to the largest structures of super clusters
of galaxies. |
|
| |
More than these gaps, for all that
searching, for all that knowledge, there still does not yet exist a complete
and unified scientific model that answers why was the universe created? Who or
what created the universe? For what purpose? What is the universe ultimately
made of? |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Copyright © 2010 UCADIA. All rights reserved.
|