| 3.9 |
Confusion and road blocks to understanding |
|
| |
By now, the reader may be a touch
frustrated at the seemingly inadequate answers that science, religion and
philosophy have so far been able to provide to those original questions- why
was the universe created? Who or what created the universe? What is the
universe ultimately made of? |
|
| |
Without adequate answers to these
questions, our hope of devising a possibly enlightened and workable model is
impossible. |
|
| |
However, there are the building blocks of
breakthroughs peppered throughout the discoveries of science and
religious/philosophical models we have discussed. It might be a question of
looking at some of the clues differently to come up with a model that can
answer these questions. |
|
| 3.9.1 |
Trying
to find a working model |
|
| |
In proposing any answer, it is vital that
we remain clear that it is only a working model to answer our questions that we
seek. |
|
| |
The model created by the Judaic/Christian religions is
a fine working model for their respective objectives for providing answers to
daily questions of behaviour. Yet in terms to answering our fundamental
questions who? why? for what ultimate purpose?, the religious models have next
to zero utility. |
|
| |
It also doesn't enhance our chances of a breakthrough
when we consider the mountains of thought that has preceded this point, yet
apparently failing to provide us a working model to answer our questions. |
|
| |
However, if we remember that our objective is not to
initially find physical proof - to see it, record it and possibly touch it- but
to understand it. Then with sufficient clues we may find a working answer. |
|
| |
Let us then start with what we know are clearly
characteristics of the smallest particles of matter that can be deduced from
common sense and logic and then work up to see if these common sense
understandings provide any clues to our questions. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Copyright © 2010 UCADIA. All rights reserved. |