| 3.14 |
Awareness existing "in theory" before matter |
|
| |
Remembering we are attempting to discover
a working model, rather than prove core answers give us a clue in itself in how
to answer the "rules of matter" argument. |
|
| 3.14.1
|
A
theoretical model |
|
| |
For argument sake, what if were trying to
create the universe in our minds? Because we are talking about creation in the
context of the universe of our minds, there is no need to worry about reality
concerning the "rules and matter" argument. If we want to dream that elephants
can fly, then in a microsecond we need only to think of it to make it happen. |
|
| |
In our theoretical world, could matter
come before rules? or in theory could rules come before matter? |
|
| |
Even
in a theoretical world, matter cannot come before rules |
|
| |
Even imagining the most basic of all
things, a dot on a blank page representing matter in dimension can't exist
without some essential rules of existence. The very notion of existence and
even of non-existence is references to models- the concept of existence, the
concept of non-existence. |
|
| |
Matter coming first before definition,
before existence, is simply not possible. It follows that the concept of
existence must precede any kind of actual existence- even in our theoretical
test laboratory in our minds. |
|
| 3.14.2
|
A
theoretical model where rules exist before matter |
|
| |
The only answer- the only answer out of
four options that holds to be true is that rules can exist before matter in
theory. |
|
| |
In other words, there is nothing to say that the
concept of existence itself cannot exist prior to matter existing. Its simply
that the notion of actual existence does not take place until matter exists. |
|
| |
Unfortunately, the use of the word "exist" and so many
variations makes the words used above seem like a tongue twister. In the next
section, we consider a clearer definition of the notion of "rules before
matter". |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Copyright © 2010 UCADIA. All rights reserved. |