 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
||||||
|
|||||||
you are here: > UCA >
4. The concept of existence
| 4.12 | The importance of rules of creation |
|
| Before we go much further, we need to pause and ask the question - why are there rules at all? We may understand the evidence of the need for rules every day. If people could shoot other people without fear of being imprisoned, then the streets would not be safe. If there were no permits required before building commenced, or transactions on purchasing land, then complete anarchy would rage in our cities. | ||
| However, in the context of the creation of the Universe, two things must occur for creation to happen: | ||
| (a) The Universe had to be something, something in dimension. Therefore a set of consequential constraints were also constructed in the process. | ||
| (b) The Universe had to continue to exist, therefore controls (or in other words rules) had to exist to ensure the Universe did not implode, explode at any moment. | ||
| Therefore the existence of certain rules is a natural consequence of creation and of sustaining that existence, not the other way around. Rules are inescapable in our lives, in the solar systems life and the Universes continued existence. | ||
| 4.12.1 | How Complex Do The Rules Get? | |
| Another reason for pausing for a moment and discussing the natural consequence of rules, is that the following chapters start to introduce a range of rules. | ||
| Initially, like looking at any new set of rules, they may appear unfamiliar and take time to digest. The good news is that from understanding a few handfuls of rules, the remainder of the book is able to show how these rules repeat, again and again at different levels as patterns. | ||
| We will see the rules and understanding of Logos being applied at each and every level, just as well will see the rules of creation (UCALEX) repeating. | ||
| 4.12.2 | What About Mathematics? | |
| Given the presence of rules, a further enhancement of understanding is able to take place when we begin to see the proportional relationships that exist at every level of the Universe. These patterns are specifically identifiable. | ||
| What this means is that we are able to describe these relationships and how they work, using abstract symbols to signify whatever the reader wishes to test the model of certain relationships on. | ||
| This leads us to the question of using a language to describe these relationships. In describing relationships the reader may expect Mathematics to be used. However, as we will discuss later in this chapter, the science of Mathematics is linked to the science of Logic, in contrast to UCA and LOGOS. Secondly, because the UCA did not have, nor need a degree in applied mathematics to create the Universe, we do not require complex formula. | ||
| When we talk about complexity, we are talking about many different things happening at the same time. However we will be able to show that the interactions throughout the Universe are in fact built up of constant relationships and patterns- in other words, we can describe the literally infinite number of interactions in the Universe back to the continued enaction of the simplest of the rules- I exist, to exist, I exist, etc. | ||
| We hope the presence of certain formulas do not unsettle the reader. At all times, we attempt to explain the relationships as clear and as simply as possible. | ||
Copyright © 2010 UCADIA. All rights reserved. |
||