 |
A greater explanation on the concept of universal reality
|
|
| |
In Chapter 4,
we outlined the first Prime Universal Constants
(PUC's) that underpin the prime ideas of most human knowledge. One of the key
Prime Universal Constants to science is the concept of the existence of a "universal
reality". |
|
| |
We were able to establish that the
origins of the word implied both the act of "seeing" (the Latin word rem) and
objects (the Latin word res). Thus the ancient saying "seeing is believing"
applies when considering the origins of the word reality. |
|
| |
Additionally, we saw how the words "real"
and "reality" were carefully developed using concepts such as truth and
consistency to denote an underlying assumption that "things are", regardless of
our perception (seeing). |
|
| |
The philosophy of physical reality peaked
at the turn of the 20th Century, just before the release of the mathematical
philosophy of Quantum Mechanics, that returned to the definition that the
Universal behaviour as being based on "individual" observation. |
|
| |
Even so, it remains the fundamental
belief of almost every human on the planet that the Universe somehow operates
on something more than "perception".
|
|
| |
One of the strongest motivations for
humanity finding an underlying rationality and objective reality of the
Universe (updating or replacing Quantum physics) is that perceptual reality has
become awfully complex.
|
|
| |
The masses of Quantum formulas for
designing rockets and estimating the behaviour of stars and galaxies have given
rise to a contemporary model that believes the underlying patterns of the
Universe are inherently chaotic -the Chaos theory- that simple changes over
many particles, gives rise to complex behaviour. |
|
| |
In spite of Quantum scientists "telling"
us that there is no aggregate reality, no underlying "truth" to everything ,
that "reality is perception", we do not believe. |
|
| |
Societies exist on the assumption that truth (underlying physical reality)
exists. In many ways this represents the contemporary "no God exists" versus
"God exists" philosophical battle. |
|
| 6.4.1
|
Perception creates reality. Reality
creates perception. Perception creates reality. Dreamer creates dream. Dream
creates dreamer. Dreamer creates dream.
|
|
 |
In Chapter 4 and 5, we explained via the
model that the Unique Collective Awareness created the
UNITAS as the dreamer creating the dream. |
|
 |
This had the effect of turning something ethereal
(dream/dimension) into reality from the perspective of the things inside the
dream. |
|
| |
That we see the UNITAS from the inside-out
means that everything we see is (theoretically) supposed to be real. But an
interesting phenomena happens upon the creation of the Unita
(Chapter 5) and upwards. |
|
| |
For while chapter 5 explains that an underlying
reality exists to the Universe, the behaviour of the Unita and each particle
above does not behave exactly as reality means it should. |
|
| |
That particles "perceive" reality as aware objects
rather than behave mechanically to an underlying reality- that they warp
reality into a new reality- is supported by the belief that every particle in
the UNITAS is aware. |
|
| |
That a particle is aware and chooses to use its
awareness to perceive- identify other particles or ignore other particles- as
intelligence or living things are seen to do, is consistent with each and every
particle in the universe being "alive". |
|
| |
Spin and attraction/repulsion |
|
| |
We say in Chapter 5 that Unita are comprised of 3
pairs of points of UCA combining to form, with an individual spin of 1/2 x 8.
We say this is the same whether or not we identify a Unita as being a "creator"
or "equatorial destructive attractor". |
|
| |
And yet we describe the behaviour of particle
construction from this point on as if the creator Unita has a value of 1 and
the equatorial destructive attractor has a negative value of -2/3.
|
|
| |
This is clearly not the case. Both particles are equal
in construction and different in physical motion of points of UCA by only one
pair of points. Yet in the model, the creator and equatorial destructive
attractor have very different behaviour. |
|
| |
The difference is explained by the awareness of
individual Unita in referencing their position with one another, creating a
perceived Universe, on which the rules of relationships and behaviour are
based. |
|
| |
In other words, the collective Unita, the UNITAS
creating another dream, a dream by their collective rules. They are the
dreamer. Each and every Unita is self-aware and collectively self-aware. |
|
| |
The invisible non-equatorial destructive attractor |
|
| |
Then we have the non-equatorial destructive attractor
(which we will later explain as being the Graviton) that to the creator and
equatorial destructive attractor Unita does not exist. |
|
| |
We will see in this chapter that the creator is aware
of the equatorial destructive attractor and vice versa, but neither "see"
non-equatorial destructive attractors. |
|
| |
Consequently there is no bonding between
non-equatorial destructive attractors and the others. This is another example
of self-aware Unita choosing to vary from the reality of the Universe to create
the new Universal reality. |
|
| |
The descriptions of rules based on self-aware behaviour |
|
| |
Over the next few sections we will see how this
self-aware perceived world of the Unita enables us to understand the problem of
perception versus reality. That once the Unita is formed, a new reality begins.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Copyright © 2010 UCADIA. All rights reserved.
|