 |
The behaviour of UNITAS and the concept of cycle |
 |
In the previous chapter, we explained
that all physical phenomena in the Universe are fundamentally constructed of
three types of UNITA in both the
"positive" spin family and "negative" family: |
| |
 |
1. Unita creators |
| |
 |
2. Unita Equatorial Destructive Attractors |
| |
 |
3. Unita Non-Equatorial Destructive Attractors |
| |
The concept of opposites attract |
| |
An understanding of natural behaviour
throughout the recording of human knowledge is the concept of "opposites
attract". |
| |
Yet we know this does not make sense. For example, if
something is opposite in spin or opposite in direction then it physically is
repelled and must move the other way. |
| |
The features of an equatorial destructive attractor
are therefore crucial to understanding one of the great contradictions of life-
opposites attract, yet can't by Logos. |
| |
Equatorial Destructive attractors are 2/3rd's
creators. What is more they have the appearance of rotation around an axis
(versus non-equatorial destructive attractors that do not). They are attracted
to creators, and creators can be attracted to them. Yet their "behaviour" is
opposite. That is, one third of their spin is completely the opposite, creating
a rotation of axis (or rotaxis) that is at a different angle. |
| |
Equatorial Destructive attractors cannot create larger
forms with creators via fusion, but they can via orbit (which we will speak of
later in this chapter). Equatorial Destructive attractors can (and do) alter
the configuration of creation via "uncreation", essentially via prevention of
forming greater structures of pure creators and via radiation, leaving a
structure "weaker" and therefore open to decomposition. |
| |
The concept of "opposites attract" is actually
imperfect likenesses attract. Equatorial Destructive attractors are not
opposite in major physical attraction, but in behaviour. Hence we now
understand the mystery of a repeating, but seemingly contradictory phrase. |
| |
The importance of destructive attractors |
| |
Without destructive attractors, human form would not
exist, nor would the Universe. For, perfectly opposite spin configured Unita,
would simply speed off in opposite directions and eventually form even larger
and larger perfect forms, till ultimately, the form of the Universe would cease
to be sufficient to sustain position in form. Without position in form, the
Universe would cease to have dimension and collapse, UCA would cease to exist. |
| |
What we mean by this is that say there
were no natural predators for cockroaches. They could live to their maximum age
and extend this age. They could grow larger because there is a plentiful food
supply and nothing will ever kill them. In a matter of generations, we may see
cockroaches the size of dogs. Take that process over a million years and we
might see cockroaches as large as buildings leaping over the countryside. |
| |
If the entire Universe of form could do
this, then eventually we would end up with one huge big blob of positive and
negative matter opposite each other without position. Dimension ceases to
exist. UCA ceases to exist. |
| |
The synergy between destructive attractors
and creators and UCA and the Universe |
| |
We see an interdependence and yet sameness
between destructive attractors and creators of the same spin. We see this
relationship as a repeat of the relationship that formed the Universe in the
1st instance- |
| |
 |
Co-dependence- one cannot exist without the other; |
| |
 |
Specialization- one is different in behaviour to the other; |
| |
 |
Change of position- to exist I change, to exist, you change. |
| |
What makes creation special is uncreation.
This is different to awareness and mere existence. This is the creation of
something we take for granted yet is far more profound than we might have
imagined- the cycle of patterns. |
| 6.5.1 |
The relative attraction between destructive
attractors and creators
|
| |
As you would expect, there is a difference
between the relative attractions between destructive attractors and creators.
This does not occur at a base of 1 creator to 1 destructive attractor, this
happens at the level where creators can form bonds with other creators and
therefore create larger forms that have greater attraction to destructive
attractors. We also see that destructive attractors cannot form fusion bonds
with creators, only orbits. |
| |
What this means is that destructive
attractors are always smaller in form size than creators but at least twice in
number. Whereas creators have their strength in the fused bonds and the motto-
the whole is greater than the sum of our parts. |
| |
When there is a greater creation involved,
there is a doubling in attractiveness to destructive attractors. The greater
the number of destructive attractors, the harder it is for other smaller parts
of creation to form and continue expansion of creation. Finally we see a
possible loosening of bonds of the creation if it is not geometrically aligned. |
| 6.5.2 |
The existence of destructive creators along
with creators at every level of nature |
| |
As we progress through the following
chapters, you will be able to see in detail the prevalence of destructive
attractors at every level of matter and complex matter (life, higher order
life, human life). |
| |
What you will also see is that some
destructive attractors themselves can convert back to being creators if their
forms are changed through the act of uncreation. We call these particles form
"hero" particles, and will discuss the concept of a "hero" later in the book. |
| 6.5.3 |
The creation of cycle |
| |
The relative behaviour of creators and
destructive attractors creates cycles of patterns of behaviour. |
| |
Creators -creating more form, becoming
greater attractions to destructive attractors-. |
| |
Destructive Attractors- blocking more
creation and eventually leading to uncreation- destroying the thing that
originally attracting them. Being active agents for creation- by creating
cycle. |
| |
We see cycle in life and death- in the
changes of matter from one form to another- night and day, light and darkness,
good and evil, the life and death of humans. But fundamentally we also see that
the agents of both creation and uncreation are the same spin- they are the
same. |
| |
Cycle of creators and uncreators gives us
the modern human understanding of good and evil- which IS a physical process,
intimately linked- the same. Everything that threatens sustainment of species
and individual sustainment could be classed as bad, or evil. Everything that
helps sustain the species and individual sustainment could be classed as good,
or holy. |
| |
As you can see, there can be a definite
difference between something being good for the species and bad for the
individual and vice versa- That is why debates on what is good and evil cannot
be classed as Universal. It is always relative, depending on the level you are
dealing with. |
| |
We see the powerful cycle analogy of the
Yin and Yang symbol of good and evil, forming a whole. We will discuss the
profound impact of this understanding of cycle in terms of human emotions and
actions in later chapters. |
| |
We see that when the concept of darkness
rules, lightness rises. We see the concept when lightness rules, darkness is
doubly attracted. |
| |
Life is a series of cycles of patterns, as
we will also discuss later. Death is as important as life. Without uncreation,
there could be no sustained creation and development. |
| |
Destructive attractors are themselves
intimately linked to the continued development of existence. |
| |
In later chapters we will discuss the
history of life on Earth, where we will cover the history of comets and
asteroids smashing into the Earth and as a result, creating the eras of
different lifeforms- the dinosaurs for example. |
| |
Humanity owes its very existence as a
species to these cataclysmic destructive attractors. If these massive
structures had not smashed into the Earth, the life ecosystem on Earth would
not have "learned " and evolution would not have resulted in the development of
the primate family of species. Therefore without darkness, there can be by
Logos and science- no light. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Copyright © 2010 UCADIA. All rights reserved. |