 |
The concept of forces |
|
| |
The concept of the existence of forces is
fundamental to all of the sciences of humanity. Given that a belief in the
existence of forces is so fundamental to any of our understanding of the world
around us, it is generally taken for granted that forces and motion are well
understood by science. |
|
| |
For instance, we may sit in a motor car,
turn on the ignition, press the accelerator and 'usually', the car will start
to move. If the car stops, we may get out and "push" the car to the side of the
road. Back home, frustrated and exhausted, we may turn on the hot water jug and
boil a cup of coffee. |
|
| |
All these are examples of different
interactions of forces creating motion. Over the thousands of years of human
development, we have been able to catalogue hundreds of thousands of results of
applying forces. We have even developed enough confidence in describing the
behaviour of forces and energy to write physical laws such as Newton's Laws of
Motion and the Four laws of Thermodynamics. |
|
| |
It would therefore seem a relatively
simple question to ask what is a force? even how many forces are there in the
Universe? And even a further question might follow, why do forces behave the
way they do? |
|
| 6.9.1
|
What is a force in contemporary science? |
|
| |
The word "force" is derived from the
Latin word fortis, meaning strong. In a scientific sense, the word is used to
describe anything that produces a change in a body's rate of motion. |
|
| |
It was through the work of Sir Isaac Newton
(1642-1727) and his three Laws of Motion that science developed the basis of
our current model describing all forces as basically "pushes" or "pulls"
(sounding very similar to attraction and repulsion). |
|
| |
Because of his historic work, the unit of all forces
is named the Newton, which is the amount of force needed to give a mass of one
kilogram an acceleration of one meter per second per second (abbreviated as
1m/sec 2 ) e.g. with every second that passes, the mass travels 1m/sec faster
than it did the second before. |
|
| 6.9.2 |
How many forces does science believe are in the
Universe? |
|
| |
One of the most famous stories regarding Sir Isaac
Newton and his quest for answers was when he was sitting under a tree in an
apple orchard and observed an apple fall from the tree. |
|
| |
It was his persistent questioning of this event that
eventually led him to develop a set of laws governing gravity- recognized
universally in contemporary science as a force. |
|
| |
Then we have concepts such as magnetism, that attracts
and repels. Magnetism and the more contemporary view of combining the behaviour
of electrons with magnetism as "electro-magnetism" is also defined by science
as a force. |
|
| |
In recent times, physics has developed the concepts of
strong force and weak force to describe the behaviour of atomic structures and
why they hold together. |
|
| |
In summary, there is now generally believed by science
to be four main forces in the Universe interacting to cause the change in
motion of all forms of matter. |
|
| 6.9.3 |
How does science explain why forces behave the way they
do? |
|
| |
Given the confidence of contemporary science to
describe the purpose of forces, behaviour of forces and the number of forces,
it may surprise you that there currently does not exist a comprehensive
scientific model that describes why (not how) forces behave the way they do. |
|
| |
The model that science desperately wants is just that-
a Unified Theory of Forces. A model, that would describe not only what forces
are made of, but why they do what they do. |
|
| |
The problem is that almost our entire knowledge base
on forces is accumulated from the observation of the behaviour of forces as
opposed to understanding why a force does what it does. |
|
| 6.9.4 |
The breakthrough in a Unified Theory of all Forces is
in clear, logol classification |
|
| |
Remember earlier, we mentioned sciences definition of
forces as "anything that produces a change in a body's rate of motion"? |
|
| |
In section 6.8 we explained that perfect vacuums do
not exist. That there will always be more than one Unita
in the Universe and that the presence of more than one particle will affect the
motion and energy level of the other particle, even if the change is
infinitesimally small. |
|
| |
If we were to use to current contemporary scientific definition of what is a
"force", then strictly speaking we would have to classify a single Unita
affecting the other as an individual "force". The same goes for the effect of
the Unita on the other. |
|
| |
If we take this to its logol conclusion, then by
science's own definition, all Unita in the Universe are forces and there are an
infinite number of forces at any given moment. |
|
| 6.9.5 |
Trying to Unify something that has not been observed
properly |
|
| |
Clearly, a definition of forces properly understood to
mean infinite objects and infinite forces, working at the same time is
unworkable (in other words the current scientific definition of what is a
"force"). Instead, we need to find a new definition that provides some insight
into the underlying behaviour of groups of Unita with other groups of Unita. |
|
| |
Before we provide an answer to this problem, let us
investigate another assumed fundamental basis of science- the concept of
energy. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Copyright © 2010 UCADIA. All rights reserved. |