A greater explanation of heat and cold
 
  The concepts of heat and cold are as fundamental to science as energy and forces. Rather than taking you on an extended journey, we will get to the heart of the matter. The definition of heat and cold used by science incorrectly describes actual behaviour. In science, the attributes of heat are increased vibration and increased movement. Expansion is also attributed.  
  However, under the laws of conservation of motion, increased vibration and spin, must accompany a slowing of motion in form with direction.  
  Therefore Heat is a corrupted term that denotes incorrect characteristics. The word Het is used to denote similarities to the concept of heat, but with correct attributes attached.  
6.17.1 The definition of Het  
  Example (1) The equator and sunshine.  
  Common observation tells us that it is hotter at the equator than at the poles. We understand this because the energy from the sun and the angle of the planet rotation makes the equator the most direct location for sunlight to reach the Earth. But why does this make the equator hotter? And what is actually happening when the temperature rises?  
  Historically, we answer this by observing that sunlight, or put it in understandable language, very fast vibrating and small particles hit the surface of the Earth and cause a reaction. Historically, we observe this reaction to be described as high vibration and high motion. But is this correct?  
  We have already learned in previous chapters that an increase in vibration and spin MUST be accompanied by a slowing of motion. So where does expansion come into play.  
  The answer lies in our misinterpretation of what is actually changing when we say something is heating up. We know that sunlight, which is very small particular traveling at high vibrations hits the Earth surface, what we forget is that they don't suddenly "cease to exist." They interact and combine. What is more, the density of the given volume of space and surface of the Earth where this occurs actually increases as more matter from the sun arrives.  
  Therefore things expand at the Equator in heat, as more particles are added to their form. This is entirely consistent with slower motion.  
  Example (2)- An atomic explosion  
  Another example showing the wrong characteristics being attributed to the definition of heat is the signature pattern of an atomic explosion.  
  The initial reaction- very high vibrations and separation of complex form is associated with a slower rate of motion, which accelerates as particles from the device separate and expand outwards, interacting with other particles until finally with increased volume, the levels of vibration/spin reduce.  
  If current sciences definition of heat was correct, then the fastest motion of particles involved in a nuclear device would be at the centre of the device at the moment of interaction of plutonium.  
  Photos of Nagasaki and Hiroshima showed incredibly that at the centre where the bomb exploded, some buildings were essentially still standing. If current science philosophy were correct, this could not happen.  
  Example (3) - Hot air versus cold air  
  In meteorology, we already ascribe a characteristic of higher density to hot air- that its "pressure" is higher than cold air. Science in this was has already admitted that a feature of heat is higher density on one hand, yet on another hand says this is because of increased motion. How can two opposite concepts be correct? Isn't density when there is more matter per volume measurement and increased motion a feature of less density, more freedom to move?  
  An example of the interaction to create HET  
  Say 3 particles in 1 volume of space exist. Say then that 5 particles of waves of light arrive into this space creating an increase in density to over 8 in 1. This increase in density creates higher vibrations, which when combined with density means there is greater HET.  
6.17.2 Col  
  Similar to the problems of the current scientific meaning of heat, cold is also incorrectly ascribed characteristics by science that contravene the laws of conservation of motion. As vibration/spin rates of particles slow, there is greater potential for motion in form.  
  Definition of Col  
  As there are less particles per unit volume, rate of vibration decreases and rate of motion increases.  
  The word Col is used to denote from the contemporary definition of cold which is incorrectly defined.  
  The features of Col can be described by two naturally occurring phenomena- when there is less sunlight ( there are less particles per unit volume in the atmosphere), the pressure of the atmosphere falls and we know it is Coller.  
  Another feature is the expansion of ice, which is a frozen form of water. If the current scientific definition of cold were true, the volume taken up by water molecules should shrink ( because science currently ascribes slower motion, slower vibrations to slower motion). Vibrations and spin do slow down, but motion increases, under a stable form causing a "strong expansion" in the volume per unit that can be taken up by say water molecules. Ice is simply water molecules slowing spin/vibration rates as they move away from each other- Increasing volume  
  An example of the working of Col  
  8 particles are in a volume area of space. 5 particles leave that space, resulting in a lowering of vibration and spin and therefore increased motion in the same amount of space. The lessening of particles lowers the rate of vibration and increases motion in form with direction.  
     
 
<<Back       Continue>>
 

Copyright © 2010 UCADIA. All rights reserved.