 |
Points to consider as how complex shapes are created from UNITAS |
|
| |
The world of sub-atomic particles is
still to come up with a cohesive standard model. In our understanding of the
behaviour and reasons for creation as well as the rules set down by the
creation of the Unita, we can provide
a cohesive framework based on science's "standard model" that attempts to
classify the number and properties of sub-atomic particles. |
|
| 6.23.1
|
(26) near neighbours |
|
| |
Let us take a theoretical Unita and look
at its original position at the time of creation at the boundary of the
Universe. |
|
| |
Once points of UCA come together in co-operation, they
form the smallest building block of matter. Just as points of UCA can have 26
near neighbours in 3-dimensional space, the Unita can also have 26 near
neighbours in 3-dimensional space. |
|
| 6.23.2 |
The possibilities of different Unita being created |
|
| |
We already know that there is a 1/8 chance of a
Creator Unita being created and a 1/8 chance of a equatorial destructive
attractor being created, and a 2/8 chance of non-equatorial destructive
attractors being created. |
|
| |
The other 4/8 is the chance of being a negative
particle- either repulsor (a negative creator) or a destructive negative
attractor. |
|
| |
From 26 near neighbours, this leaves us with the likely creation of 3.25
creators 3.25 equatorial destructive attractors 6.5 non equatorial destructive
attractors and 13 particles that repel |
|
| 6.23.3 |
Remembering the neutrality of attraction of
non-equatorial destructive Unita attractors to like spin family |
|
| |
Remembering that to creators and equatorial
destructive attractors, the non-equatorial destructive attractors are neither
"attractive" nor "repulsive", therefore forces of repulsion for both groups of
"positive" and "negative" particles will be greater than the force of
attraction initially. |
|
| |
This ratio of repulsion to attraction is around 2:1
until sufficient distance occurs between opposite spin families. |
|
| |
We will use this feature in later chapters to describe
the constant "expansion" in form of the Universe at its boundaries, compared to
the forces of attraction the further away from the edge of the Universe
particles are. |
|
| 6.23.4 |
The probabilities of near neighbours being same spin
and type determines what is most likely to be formed |
|
| |
Based on 3.25 creators and 3.25 equatorial destructive
attractors out of 26 near neighbours, it should be theoretically possible that
one of the shapes formed is three creators combining. |
|
| |
This would be possible, if the odds of three particles
next to each other being creators at the same time. Unfortunately, the odds for
this are 3.13%, which is less than the probabilities of forming some bonds out
of 26 near neighbours (3.8%). Therefore 3 creators coming together is
impossible within near neighborhood. |
|
| 6.23.5 |
The powers of attraction |
|
| |
Attraction to work, to form greater complexity is
either same spin, same density shapes coming together to form a larger shape,
or shapes coming closer to form orbits. For orbits to happen, there needs to be
an imbalance of forces. |
|
| |
Most importantly, the geometric shape ensures the
minimum required loss of motion to create form. Thus geometric strength once
again provides an indicator of the potential maximum motion in form of
particles. |
|
| 6.23.6 |
The simple to complex-simple cycle |
|
| |
What we also see in the formation of the first level
of complex shapes is the working of the simple into the complex to produce the
simple. |
|
| |
While there are eight different types of Unita classed
into four broad groupings, we see that only two complex shapes are created in
the first instance with Unita. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Copyright © 2010 UCADIA. All rights reserved. |