The concept of prime numbers
 
  In our day to day lives, we link numbers to real objects- whether it be the quantity of money we earned the previous week, to the number of shopping items to purchase at a supermarket. However, numbers have the additional quality of being able to exist independently of real objects.  
  For example, when we write down the number 6 on a sheet of paper- the number exists in a dimension on the paper, even though it has not yet been linked to any real world object.  
  Another relevant example is the entire universe of unita we have just described. In effect, when we talk of unita (smallest units of matter), we are talking about every number possible- from 1 to infinity.  
6.26.1 Relationships and patterns between numbers  
  Where mathematics is able to help us in answering our question of the validity of unita and numbers is in those discoveries of relationships and patterns between numbers. The first and most important is the relationship between prime numbers, perfect numbers and composite numbers.  
  A prime number is one that is larger than 1, that is divisible only by 1 and itself. In other words a unique number. Examples of primes are: 1,2,3,5,7,11,13,19,23,31,37...  
  A perfect number is one that is equal to the sum of all its possible divisors, except the number itself. Examples of perfect numbers are: 6, 28,496,8128.  
  A composite number is a number that can be written as the sum of two or three primes. In effect every number greater than 2 can be written as the sum of two primes and every number greater than 6 can be written as the sum of 3 primes.  
  While there has been many hundreds of years of serious mathematical thought undertaken to seek to find the perfect formula for predicting primes, no formula has yet succeeded.  
  However, a little known pattern that holds for all primes is that all primes can be found in pairs, or to the left, or right of multiples of the number six- the smallest perfect number.  
  For example, primes described to the left of a multiple of six A and to the right B may be described in the following way:  
 
6 AB
12 AB
18 AB
24 A
30 AB
36 B
42 AB
48 AB
54 A
60 AB
66 B
72 AB
78 B
84 A
90 AB
96 B
 
  The pattern holds for even extraordinary large prime pairs such as: 1 000 000 009 650 (divisible by 6) A= 1 000 000 009 649, B= 1000 000 009 651.  
  There is nothing to suppose this pattern between unique numbers (primes) and multiples of the smallest perfect number in the universe does not exist right up to infinity.  
6.26.2 The relationship remains constant, yet the pattern appears perfectly unique (random)  
  While the sample listed above is only small, it shows that while the pattern between perfect unity and uniqueness exists for each multiple of six, the pattern of left and right AB, left only A, right only B is unique. In other words, the pattern of primes around the constant of multiples of six appears a completely unique non-repeating pattern- or pure randomness.  
  We conclude that this pattern of primes represents the purest pattern of randomness in the Universe- the code of pure "chaos".  
  This is why no formula has succeeded in the perfect answer to predicting primes- because predicting primes is predicting perfect randomness. We call this pattern the Unique Collection of Primes.  
6.26.3 What is the importance of the Unique Collection of Primes?  
  Here in numbers, in pure abstract, we see the synergy existing between perfection and uniqueness to show that even in numbers uniqueness of pattern exists.  
  In terms of all patterns of randomness, the Unique Collective Code of Primes represents the highest code of randomness, from which all other codes are less chaotic (more predictable) to some degree. In other words, the Unique Collection of Primes represents the ultimate code breaker of all things random.  
 

One becomes many: many becomes one.

  
 

The awareness of UCA and UNITAS

  
  It is easy to think that UCA remains whole in perception and many at the same time- a paradox of mind.  
  Whereas in fact, the opposite is the case. UCA ceases to be one at the creation of infinite UNITA. It becomes the physical ALL. It becomes very real. The subtle difference is crucial. The concept of an infinite all knowingness is less the case than a living infinite arrangement of unique awareness at differing degrees.  
  Awareness is a bottom up experience- not a top down. It is within us that we experience awareness- not without.  
     
     
 
<<Back       Continue>>
 

Copyright © 2010 UCADIA. All rights reserved.