| 8.3 |
The historic understandings of molecules and the mysteries surrounding them
|
|
| |
No other level of matter appears so
complex or mysterious as that of molecules. A molecule is by definition a group
of two or more atomic structures bonded together in some kind of three
dimensional structure. The air we breath are molecules. The water we wash in is
molecules. Our bodies and everything we eat and use is made up of complex
arrangements of molecules. |
|
| |
Since science was able to deduce that
living and non-living complex structures such as skin, teeth, hair, blood,
cells, plastics are all made up of complex molecules, literally millions of
different molecular structures have been identified, from very simple
combinations of elements such as Hydrogen and Oxygen (e.g. Water H2O), through to
protein molecules which form the basis of organic cellular structure in living
animals. |
|
| |
From the beginning of this century, many
attempts have been made to properly categorize molecular structures into
"family" groupings and techniques have been standardized in chemistry to
describe chemical reactions ( two structures coming together to form new
structures). |
|
| |
As knowledge has been built up from
previous knowledge, we now have hundreds of thousands of pages of models we can
now call Molecular Science, Chemistry and the Biological Sciences. |
|
| |
Yet contemporary science is now faced
with several major problems regarding our overall models of molecules: |
|
| 1.
|
Most of the formulas and training in
understanding molecular reactions is based on two dimensional diagrams and
formulas describing a three dimensional world.
|
|
| |
For example, simple sugar molecules can
be written 6 Carbon, 6 Oxygen and 12 Hydrogen atoms. But it is their 3
dimensional arrangement that determines their characteristics and behaviour.
Our two dimensional system continues to provide the wrong picture as to exactly
what is happening in the molecular world.
|
|
| 2. |
Our groupings of many atomic structures into families
has been based on the groups of atoms, not their shape and underlying
similarities.
|
|
| |
As science has never fully considered that atomic
structures above Hydrogen and Helium can be made of combinations of the two, we
see large gaps in understanding the similarities between different molecules
such as Carbon Dioxide (1 Carbon and 2 Oxygen) and say Ozone (3 Oxygen).
Contemporary science is unable to grasp that they are all part of the Carbon
family.
|
|
| |
We saw function and multiple purpose due to structure
using the same base as sub-atomics, yet more sophisticated, hence the
importance of Steph.
|
|
| 3. |
Finally, we see the general loss in "wonder" associated
with the way molecules form more complex shapes that ultimately lead to
cellular life and to such structures as the human being.
|
|
| |
Since science was able to deduce that human beings are
largely made up of nothing more than billions of atoms of a few basic elements,
science, has lost much of its understanding of molecular structures being
self-aware living things. In destroying the myth of molecules that make up life
holding some secret or unique essence we have lost our ability to rationally
explain how molecules can and do exhibit the necessary "intelligence" required
of a complex organism.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Copyright © 2010 UCADIA. All rights reserved.
|