 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
||||||
|
|||||||
you are here: > UCA >
9. Matter- unified theory of
| 9.16 |
What is more effective for moving power- fusion or fission?
|
|||||
| Fission reactions are the reverse of the four fusion reactions we have discussed so far. There are only four kinds of fission reactions: | ||||||
|
||||||
| The major sources of power for humanity (e.g. the ability to move things via engines) is based on fission reactions. We use fission reactions for major energy companies such as nuclear fission, coal fission, petroleum fission. We have motor cars that use petroleum mix for fission and of course we have the humble household appliances such as microwave ovens for fission. | ||||||
| Basically the entire planet of humanity is dependent on fission power for sustaining their quality of life everyday. | ||||||
| 9.8.1 | What are the ideal benefits of a power source? | |||||
| If we were to dream of an ideal power source, what would be the criteria: | ||||||
| (1) | The best possible power source, would be one that is renewable. A source that is guaranteed of never running out; | |||||
| (2) | Next, our ideal power source would be one that is powerful enough to run all the engines and needs of humanity today, including such diverse applications as space travel through to cooking the dinner; | |||||
| (3) | Next, our ideal power source would have to be extremely cheap and easy to use. It should enable versatile enough appliances and machines that we can vacuum, through to drive the family on an overland holiday; | |||||
| (4) | Finally, it should be as clean and as safe as possible, with no harmful side affects to the environment or to humans and higher order life. | |||||
| 9.8.2 | How does fission power methods compare to fusion methods? | |||||
| Let us look at how fission methods of power compare to fusion methods of power according to our list of attributes for an "ideal" power source: | ||||||
| 9.8.3 | If fusion power is so good, why aren't we using it instead of fission power? | |||||
| Why indeed do we still use petroleum, when photo-electro-magnetic ergon particle fields can lift large objects with ease? Why indeed do we still use natural gas, when solar power with enhanced collectors could power an entire city? | ||||||
| The simple and probably the real answer that humanity has not yet learned to fully harness the power of fusion power is because we have so incorrectly described the basic features and models of the Universe. | ||||||
| Fusion is about creation. It is a good act. Fusion is the enaction of all the 12 laws of the Universe stand for. Fission is the opposite to creation. It is when things become less than what they were. It is darkness. Yet without fission, there could be no learning and no re growth- evolution. | ||||||
| Contrary to conspiracies about large petroleum companies stopping new energy sources, it is simply the inability of their scientists to use more sophisticated and synergetic models of the world around them. Petroleum companies are energy companies in the 90's. If there were ways of producing new cheap power supply products, they'd be into it. | ||||||
| 9.8.4 | Nature resists fission but encourages fusion | |||||
| The profound understanding of fission compared to fusion is that nature encourages fusion, yet resists fission. In other words, fusion power is naturally easier than fission. It is more controllable. | ||||||
| 9.8.5 | Show me how fusion works? | |||||
| We have described the four types of fusion at length in the previous pages. At the end of this book in Chapter 24- Universal Laws, we also provide formulas. | ||||||
|
Copyright © 2010 UCADIA. All rights reserved. |
||||||