16.3
The powerful related knowledge structure of UCA
 
  While the massive volume of new terms and information related to human life that needs to be digested to properly understand, there is a method by which understandings can be clearer.  
  It is based on the assumption that the previous knowledge you have read in the previous chapters provides a logos support to the understandings required in this section. In other words, we already know a great deal about the human body, mind and likely birth pattern thanks to the contents of the previous chapters.  
16.3.1 Missing or badly described terms and processes simplified  
  One method of clarifying the mass of terms and relationships associated with the human being is to ensure that the categorization of elements and their description are as simple as possible and provide a cohesive model.  
  In other words, the description of groups of objects in terms of their function, greatly assists the goal of understanding human bodily function. Likewise, the use of words and combination of words to denote their relationship by category and purpose also assist in understanding the function and structure of the human body.  
16.3.2 The use of different language, not necessarily different objects  
  This insight brings into light the requirement to consider the use of different language to describe what otherwise are perfectly good and common sense concepts because the word is complex and unrelated in sound or construction to related words. This is a common problem across English.  
  On the face of it, the word elbow and knee seem completely different, yet both are bone structures and joints. At the other extreme, the use of long worded latin phrases to describe these components also makes the task of identification harder as one needs to learn latin to decipher the long meaning of words.  
16.3.3 Using common sense- a six letter combination yields  
  The use of six letters (26 letters in the alphabet as options per place) yields 300 million different word options- more than enough to construct a inter-related category scheme requiring the memorization of placement of letters into only six possible positions- a much simpler exercise for the human brain rather than descriptions longer than eight letters.  
  Again emphasizing that the issue rests not with the concept attached to a word, but the word itself, the complexity of understanding the terms and relationships of ideas associated with the human body are substantially improved just by simplifying the language.  
16.3.4 The reluctance of contemporary science to break with tradition  
  Even though the work of Michelangelo and early scientists has now since been updated and enhanced, there is a general reluctance within the structure of contemporary science to break with naming traditions. Part of this tradition, it is argued is out of respect for the originators of those seminal thoughts of understanding. Another reason, not often spoken is that it is a system that offers immortality to those scientists that discover new theories and ideas.  
  Similar to the analogy of pulling a thread from a rug only to find it gradually unweave into a ball of twine, the wholesale renaming and simplification of terminology used in medical science would wipe out thousands of words created in honor of hundreds of pioneering scientists.  
  So in spite of the common sense opportunity to greatly enhance our understandings and harness human knowledge, we find in medical science, probably no greater adherence to tradition and complexity.  
16.3.5 UCA as a model breaks with that tradition  
  In an approach that will almost certainly generate anger amongst some quarters of medical science, the model UCA breaks with the naming conventions of contemporary science and instead creates a naming system incorporating relationships, larger categories and functions. Thus in recognizing a name, in combination with another set of words, a person may better understand both the location of an object, its relationship to other objects within the human body and its principle function.  
16.3.6 The power of integrated knowledge  
  What the restructure of knowledge via UCA means is the ability to fully comprehend that what has traditionally been seen as an inherently complex subject- the thousands of terms and bits of understanding associated with the complete answer of "what makes me human".  
  The proof of its use is in considering the traditional level of understanding of a fully qualified medical practitioner on the function, purpose and relationships of specialized tissues of the human body compared to the level of understanding that you currently hold, if you have already read chapter 1 to chapter 15 of UCA before coming to this chapter.  
  This is the final purpose of chapters such as this. To be able to describe a level of detail to the answer of "what makes me human" equal if not greater than that normally associated with a recognized "expert" in the field. If you understand. Then the model of UCA provides utility that extends into scientific areas of medical knowledge and psychological well being.  
 
<<Back       Continue>>
 

Copyright © 2010 UCADIA. All rights reserved.