| 20.16 |
The belief system |
 |
| |
A cohesive belief system is the second
component found in every society and every sophisticated city structure. In
terms of instruments representing a cohesive belief system, the most common has
been the State Creed, or "decree". |
|
| |
The State Creed represents the ultimate
instrument of power in the formation of a society. Hence, its legitimacy is
paramount in considering the legitimacy of the society. |
|
| |
In terms of the association of prime
constants, they can be divided into both prime positive and prime negative. |
|
| |
Prime Positive |
|
| |
| Religion |
|
Science |
| God or Gods |
|
Universal Knowledge |
| laws from gods |
|
Universal laws ( science) |
| |
Truth |
|
| |
|
Reality |
| |
|
fact |
| |
Validity |
|
| |
Reason |
|
| |
Rationality |
|
| |
Logic |
|
| |
Right |
|
| |
Correct |
|
|
|
| |
Prime Negative |
|
| |
| Religion |
|
Science |
| |
Bad |
|
| Evil |
|
Wrong |
| Lie |
|
False |
|
|
| |
As we mentioned, these lists of Prime
Universal Constants is not the complete list of constants. There are several
terms in addition that need to now be considered in the context of Societies
and sense of self. |
|
| |
In addition, most social organisations of
significant behavioral influence over large populations have developed
Secondary Universal Constants. Most notably, these secondary universal
constants outline more sophisticated positive ideas such as liberty,
citizenship as well as negative concepts such as treason, deceit, fraud, guilt
and win. We will now seek to place a context regarding the use and development
of these key ideas. |
|
| 20.16.1 |
The concept of moral law |
|
| |
In any organized system of human endeavor, rules must
and do exist. "Ideally" rules exist to place in action the goals of the
collective and to ensure the organisation can function. In less ideal and more
common circumstances, rules exist at the discretion of the ruling elite to
maintain control and limit the populations influence. |
|
| |
It was the Romans that excelled in developing rule
systems and the application os classifications regardless of existing localized
cultures. The Romans integrated, while at some stage going at lengths to define
negative behaviour against the State. |
|
| 20.16.2 |
The codification of divine law |
|
| |
The concept of anointment by the divine provided a
key concept enabling the effective description of the transfer of power from
God ( or Gods) to mortals ( to be discussed in a moment) |
|
| |
The codification of divine law 5thus enabled detailed
rules applying to all behaviour to be described. As such, some religions such
as Islam, Christianity and especially Orthodox Judaism have developed highly
detailed and sophisticated rule systems. |
|
| 20.16.3 |
The concept of anointment |
|
| |
In parallel to the prime universal
concept of the existence of Gods, or God, is the idea that the Gods or God
periodically bestow their authority and or wisdom upon human beings. |
|
| |
The words Messiah (hebrew) and Christos
(Greek, Gnostic) mean simply "the anointed one". The word King King |
|
| |
The word King comes from the Old English
kine and kune, themselves translations of the ancient Greek word Kurie meaning
"lord". (hence the hymn kyrie eleison, "lord have mercy") cyning, later cing,
cyng, cyne (Old Engish = royal) cingulum = girdle of a priests alb. A band
surrounding the base of a tooth |
|
| 20.16.4 |
The concept of democracy |
|
| |
The concept of democracy, of elected officials as
opposed to divinely anointed representatives is a fairly new concept and first
emerged in Greece at end of the reign of Tyrants in the 5th century BCE. While
this was considered democracy, in fact the system relied upon the unelected
influence of the ruling financial and intellectual elite. |
|
| 20.16.5 |
The concept of liberty and freedom |
|
| |
Today, we consider the concept of freedom one of our
inalienable rights. However, the concept of being free is relatively quite
recent. Freedom of sorts has been implied within social structures for
thousands of years. |
|
| |
However it is not until institutions such
as the Magna Carta, Declaration of Independence and the French Constitution
were written that the concept of individual rights were ever codified. Today,
in the West, we call this common law. |
|
| |
It seems strange for us to imagine, but in years of
old, even as little as three hundred years ago, individuals could be mugged and
put into service (forced service) on ships |
|
| 20.16.6 |
The concept of citizenship |
|
| |
Citizenship is the legal relationship of an individual
has with the state. As a legal concept, citizenship demands from the individual
a permanent allegiance to the state ( including commitments to bear arms in
times of war, to avoid engaging in anti-state activities and to contribute to
the financial well-being of the state) and confers upon the citizen full
political rights, thus allowing him/her to participate in the state's decision
making process. |
|
| |
The conferring of citizenship upon an individual is an
implicit recognition by the state of the integration of the citizen into the
political system. |
|
| |
Citizenship is a concept and a status, first became
important around 400 BC Greece. here it was neither a national nor a universal
status. Citizenship was restricted to a small elite and conferred rights and
privileges not enjoyed by the majority of the populace. In many ways it was a
negative right used to discriminate against foreigners and members of the
"lower classes." |
|
| |
It was this negativism which was embraced by the
Romans who saw citizenship as a means of distinguishing between "Romans" and
all the various nationalities and races embraced by the Roman Empire. |
|
| |
But the first century after Christ this distinction
had virtually disappeared as the Romans awarded citizenship as a sign of
loyalty or for people who demonstrated a commitment to the Empire. |
|
| |
The Middle Ages saw citizenship , although still a
narrow and privileged concept, being used by the emergent merchant class as a
protection against the frequently excessive claims of local barons and
noblemen. |
|
| |
Historically, the term "citizen" changed meaning in
the latter half of the 18thC. Prior to that a citizen was simply a member of a
city or town, local borough or municipal corporation. The terms citizen, droit
de cite cittadinaza ciudadania and bergerrecht all indicated the relationship
an individual had with his immediate town or city. These terms were
distinguished from "subject", which was used to indicate an individuals
relationship to the monarchy under which he lived. |
|
| |
This division was destroyed and the concept of
"citizen" established by the French intellectuals who, at the outset of the
French Revolution, articulated the idea of the "citoyen" in the famous
Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen. The importance of this
concept was that the individual enjoyed a level of civic freedom and had some
involvement in the political process- both these rights had been denied under
the rules of French Monarchy. |
|
| |
Most historians now see the French Revolution of 1789
as the beginning of what we call " modern history" . In its revolt against
feudalism and monarchic rule, it set in motion a series of events which led to
the rise to power of the middle classes and the establishment of nations and
democracies throughout Europe and European-influenced countries. |
|
| |
Systematically in the last two centuries, most Western
countries have defined for themselves concepts of citizenship and nationality.
There are obviously subtle differences from country to country- The United
States talks in terms of a national of the United States. Britain has
established a complex notion of British subject and commonwealth citizen with
differing rights according to where an individual fits into a subtle grading
system. and the French have devised rules of citizenship which vary according
to whether the individual is a native of France, a native of a colony or a
native of a past colony. |
|
| |
At core, however, there are only four means by which
citizenship is granted: |
|
| |
| Birth within a country, in most cases automatically endows citizenship |
| Direct descent from a parent who is recognized as a citizen |
| marriage to a citizen may endow citizenship |
| Most countries have naturalization facilities which allows an alien, after the
fulfillment of certain requirements (usually residential), to apply for
citizenship. Naturalization usually requires a specific written or verbal
commitment to the territory concerned. |
|
|
| |
There are two grounds for citizenship by birth known
as jus soli and jus sanguinis. Jus soli is where a child acquires citizenship
simply by being born in a territory. Jus sanguinis is where citizenship is
conferred, even if a child is born outside a territory, because at the time of
birth, one or more patents were citizens of the territory. |
|
| |
In many ways citizenship is an imprecise term. It
broadly expresses the relationship between an individual and the state but in
the last two hundred years has been open to endless interpretation- usually to
the state's advantage. |
|
| |
Perhaps the most famous citizenship exclusion case was
in 1857 when the United States Supreme Court in what has become the Dred Scott
case, declared that no negro, free or slave, could become a United States
citizen. This led indirectly to the Civil War and eventually to a change in the
United States constitution. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Copyright © 2010 UCADIA. All rights reserved. |